| Supplier A | Verified On-site process audit completed; incoming, in-process, and final inspection records sampled. | Third-party report available for 3.2 V lithium iron phosphate cells; 80% capacity retention after 3,000 cycles at 25°C under defined test conditions. | Cell batch, BMS lot, operator, torque value, and end-of-line test data linked to pack serial number. | 36 months or 2,000 equivalent full cycles, subject to agreed operating limits and capacity threshold. | Three closed 8D records reviewed; containment, root-cause analysis, corrective action, and effectiveness checks included. | UN 38.3, IEC 62619, and transport test documentation available for the audited pack configuration. | 94 / 100 | Low |
| Supplier B | Verified Remote audit completed with production photographs, quality records, and live video verification. | Internal report indicates 80% capacity retention after 2,500 cycles at 25°C; raw test files were available for review. | Pack serial number linked to cell batch and final inspection results; operator-level traceability partially available. | 24 months or 1,500 equivalent full cycles, with exclusions for over-temperature, over-discharge, and unauthorized modification. | Two 8D reports reviewed; corrective actions documented, but effectiveness verification was limited to one case. | UN 38.3 and IEC 62619 documents available; configuration matching should be confirmed before shipment. | 86 / 100 | Low–Medium |
| Supplier C | Partial Pre-shipment sample inspection completed; no independent factory process audit performed. | Supplier summary claims 2,000+ cycles to 80% capacity; detailed test conditions and raw data were not fully provided. | Cell batch and pack serial numbers recorded; BMS firmware version was not consistently included. | 24 months from shipment date; cycle-life commitment is not stated in the warranty document. | One 8D report provided; root cause was identified, but preventive-action evidence was incomplete. | UN 38.3 available; product-specific IEC 62619 evidence pending review. | 72 / 100 | Medium |
| Supplier D | Verified On-site audit completed; calibrated test equipment and final assembly controls were sampled. | Independent laboratory data shows 80% capacity retention after 3,500 cycles at 25°C; test current, cut-off voltage, and rest intervals were documented. | Full traceability from cell incoming inspection through welding, BMS programming, final test, and shipment release. | 36 months or 3,000 equivalent full cycles, with defined storage, temperature, and depth-of-discharge conditions. | Five closed 8D records reviewed; recurring-failure analysis and effectiveness checks were documented. | UN 38.3, IEC 62619, EMC test records, and protection-function verification available for the reviewed model. | 97 / 100 | Low |
| Supplier E | Partial Document review completed; production-line audit and sample retention process were not verified. | Marketing specification lists 1,500–2,000 cycles to 80% capacity; no third-party report or raw test dataset was submitted. | Shipment-level records available; cell-level batch traceability and BMS firmware history were unavailable. | 18 months from shipment; warranty claim response time and replacement process were not clearly defined. | No completed 8D record was provided; supplier uses a general corrective-action form. | UN 38.3 document provided; additional safety and abuse-test evidence required before approval. | 58 / 100 | High |